While having heard counsel in Writ Petition No. 2793 of 2008 challenging an order declining interim injunction, the High Court directed the parties to maintain status-quo until the final disposal of the underlying Revenue Court Suit No. 36 of 2007 as it is at an advanced stage, without affecting the merits or future disposal of the suit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
955-wp-2793-08.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2793 OF 2008
Dilip Jaysing Jadhav … Petitioner Vs Shamrao Yellappa Kamble ... Respondent
Mr. Wasim Samlewale i/b Umesh Mankapure, for the Petitioner. Mr. V.S. Gokhale, for the Respondent.
CORAM : M. S. SONAK, J. DATE :26 APRIL, 2016
P.C. :
March, 2008 made by the District Judge-3, Kolhapur in Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 19 of 2008, by which, the District Judge-3 has confirmed the order dated 17th January, 2008 made by the Civil Judge,
Junior Division, Peth-Vadgaon in R.C.S. No. 36 of 2007, declining interim injunction in favour of the petitioner-plaintiff.
were directed to maintain status-quo. The status-quo orders, it appears, have been continued till today.
Sam 1/2
955-wp-2793-08.odt
circumstances, although there is no necessity to interfere with the impugned order, it will be appropriate if the parties to maintain statusquo, which in any case, as continued since 23rd April, 2008. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of, by directing the parties to maintain status-quo until the final disposal of R.C.S. No. 36 of 2007.
order.
Sam 2/2
Dilip Jaysing Jadhav
Shamrao Yellappa Kamble
M. S SONAK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
