Writ petition by Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited filed under Article 226. Petitioner was directed to file an application expediting the matter before the Debt Recovery Tribunal. The petition was dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
11.wp2644.14.doc
RMA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2644 OF 2014
Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited : Petitioner
V/s.
Vinodkumar Agarwal & Ors. : Respondents
Mr.Rohit Gupta with Mr.Nikhil Rajani i/b. V.Deshpande & Co., for the petitioner.
Mr.D.D. Gaddam i/b. Mr.R.P.Lote for respondent no.1.
CORAM : D.H. WAGHELA, C.J. & SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J. DATE : FEBRUARY 26, 2016.
P.C.:
After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he will prefer an application before the D.R.T. and those proceedings are required to be expedited.
1 of 2
11.wp2644.14.doc
RMA
(CHIEF JUSTICE)
(SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.)
2 of 2
Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited
Vinodkumar Agarwal
D.H. WAGHELA
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
