Disposed

Jijamata Mahila Bachat Gat through Its President Vithabai Gulba Kosambe v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC25 Jul 2016WP/2612/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition by Jijamata Mahila Bachat Gat seeking a fair price shop licence directed the District Supply Officer, Nanded, to decide the application expeditiously within eight weeks. The petition was disposed of accordingly.

What did the court decide?

Direction to District Supply Officer, Nanded, to take decision on licence application within eight weeks.

Jijamata Mahila Bachat Gat through Its… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

40.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

40 WRIT PETITION NO. 2612 OF 2016

¶4

JIJAMATA MAHILA BACHAT GAT THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT
VITHABAI GULBA KOSAMBE

¶5

VERSUS

¶6

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶7

...

¶8

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Bachate Pralhad D.
AGP for Respondents State: Mr. M. B. Bharaswadkar
Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Mr. Y. B. Borkar

¶9

CORAM: R. M. BORDE &
K. L. WADANE, JJ.
 DATE:25th July, 2016

¶10

ORDER:

¶11

1.Heard learned counsel for the respective

¶12

parties.

¶13

2. This petition can be disposed of by issuing

¶14

directions to respondent No.2-District Supply Officer,

¶15

Nanded to take decision on the application of the
petitioner for issuing him licence for running fair
price shop as expeditiously as possible, preferably

¶16

within eight weeks and it is accordingly directed.

¶17

3. Writ petition stands disposed of.

¶18

JPC

¶19

1/1

Jijamata Mahila Bachat Gat through Its President Vithabai Gulba Kosambe v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jijamata Mahila Bachat Gat through Its President Vithabai Gulba Kosambe v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dnyandeo Savitra Dengle Vs Ramrao Savitra Dengle, L.Rs. Radhakisan and Others

The Commissioner of Sugar Maharashtra State, Sahakar Sankul,Pune and Ors. Vs Gangamal Industries and Construction Ltd. Thr Its Auth. Signatory Vishnu Shripatrao Khedkar

Shantilal Chandulal Borana Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Sitaram Baliram Korde and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Nurulla Khan Vahidulla Khan Pathan and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Dnyanoba Dhanaji Korde and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others