The court clarified that a lower court order directing parties to meet a marriage counselor and prepare an access model does not grant immediate supervised access. Access will be considered after the counselor’s report. The petition was disposed of based on this clarification.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
osk P27-WP-2532-16.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2532 OF 2016
| Mrs.Mugdha Niranjan Argade V/s. |
… | Petitioner |
|---|---|---|
| Mr.Niranjan Charudatta Argade | … | Respondent |
Mr.S.M.Kelkar i/b. Mr.Mandar Limaye for the Petitioner. Mr.B.V.Holambe for the Respondent.
CORAM : M.S. SONAK, J.
DATE : 26th FEBRUARY, 2016.
P.C.
granted by the Family Court.
1/2
osk P27-WP-2532-16.odt
and on the basis of the same, the Marriage Counselor can prepare the report, as he deems fit. Thereafter, the Family Court will obviously consider the report after offering both the parties appropriate and adequate opportunity of placing their view points before the Court.
(M.S. SONAK, J.)
2/2
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the lower court order directing parties to meet a marriage counselor and prepare an access model grants immediate supervised access.
Whether the writ petition should be disposed of by clarifying that access is to be considered only after the counselor’s report.
If no clarification is necessary to dispose of the petition. Mr. B.V. Holambe, counsel for the respondent, agreed with the interpretation.
Mrs. Mugdha Niranjan Argade
Mr. Niranjan Charudatta Argade
M.S. SONAK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
