Criminal writ petition disposed as infructuous because cognizance was already taken and a charge sheet filed against the third respondent under IPC sections 324, 502, and 506.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Order
0812wp252.16
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No. 252 OF 2016.
Sanjay Mukundrao Deshmukh and another - VERSUS-
The State of Maharashtra and others
Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI &
KUM. INDIRA JAIN, JJ.
DATE : DECEMBER 08, 2016.
Heard Shri Y.V. Nayyar, learned
Counsel for the petitioners, Shri M.J. Khan,
learned A.P.P. for respondent nos. 1 and 2 and Shri S. Borkute, learned counsel for respondent no.3.
respondents make statement that cognizance of
report lodged by the petitioner against respondent
no.3 is already taken and in Crime No. 119/2015,
charge sheet is already filed against respondent
Order
0812wp252.16
2
no.3 under Section 324, 502 and 506 of Indian Penal Code.
JUDGE JUDGE
Rgd.
Sanjay Mukundrao Deshmukh
another
The State of Maharashtra
B.P. DHARMADHIKARI
KUM. INDIRA JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
