The High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition under Article 226 challenging orders rejecting a stay prayer in execution proceedings.
Petition allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file appropriate proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP2462_16.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MUMBAI CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2462 OF 2016
Annubai Mahapati Gaikwad and another Vs.
Kishna Dadu Sapkal and others
… Petitioners
… Respondents
Mr. Vishwanath S. Talkute a/w. Mr. S. R. Ghanwat for Petitioners. Mr. Bhushan Walimbe for Respondents.
CORAM : R. G. KETKAR, J. DATE : MARCH 14, 2016
P.C. :
Heard Mr. Talkute, learned Counsel for petitioners and Mr. Walimbe, learned Counsel for respondents at length.
(R. G. KETKAR, J.)
Minal Parab
1/1
Annubai Mahapati Gaikwad
Kishna Dadu Sapkal
R. G. Ketkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
