Perused an order in WP No.1915 of 2001; disposed of applicant's WP without appearance on ground of time; petitioner to satisfy cause of action survival if applying for restoration.
Petition disposed; rule discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
wp-2399.03
ash
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2399 OF 2003
Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders.
None for the Petitioner.
Shri F. Devetri, Senior Counsel along with Ms. Hemlata Jain and Ms.S.G.Vedpathak i/b Maneksha & Sethna for the Respondent Nos.5 and 6. Shri L.T. Satelkar, AGP for the Respondent Nos.1, 3 and 4 State. Shri Rohan Kadam i/b Shri K.D.Abichandani for the Respondent No.8.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.A.SAYED, JJ DATED : 24TH OCTOBER 2016
P.C.:
. Perused the order dated 14th October 2016 passed
in Writ Petition No.1915 of 2001. None appears for the Petitioner. In view of what is recorded in Paragraph 2 of the order dated 14th October 2016, the Petition is disposed of. Rule is discharged. We make it clear that if the Petitioner applies for restoration, the Petitioner will have to satisfy that the cause of action still continues to survive.
Petitioner
Respondents
A.S. OKA
A.A.SAYED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court