sr. no..odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE…
Writ petition disposed of on leave to withdraw.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
43 sr. no..odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 2348 OF 2016
VINAY LAXMIKANT BARHALE
VERSUS
CITY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF MAHARASHTRA LTD THROUGH ITS ADMINISTRA
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Sharad V.Natu AGP for Respondent No.3 : Mr. A.V. Deshmukh. A
CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA & K.K. SONAWANE, JJ.
DATE : 3rd May, 2016.
PER COURT:
1] Heard. Mr. Natu, on instructions states that after filing of the present petition, fresh order is passed by the respondent and he will have to assail the said order. He, therefore, seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to assail the said order. Writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs.
[K.K. SONAWANE,J.] [S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J]
grt/-
Vinay Laxmikant Barhale
City Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd
S.V. Gangapurwala
K.K. Sonawane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
