Petitioners received physical possession of plots. Counsel stated no grievance subsisted. Writ petition disposed of with no operative direction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp-2183.12
1
pmw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2183 OF 2012
Haridas M. Nayak and Anr. … Petitioners Versus State of Maharashtra and Ors. … Respondents
Mr. D.H.Mehta i/by M/s. S. Pathak & Co. for the Petitioners. Ms. Geeta Shastri, Additional Government Pleader for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
Mr. Kalpesh Patil and Mr. Nikhil Chavan i/by Vijay D. Patil for the Respondent No.11.
Mr. A.Y. Sakhare, Senior Counsel a/w Mrs. Shobha Ajitkumar for the Respondent Nos.3 to 6 – BMC.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & C.V. BHADANG, JJ. DATE : 15th JANUARY, 2016
P.C.
1 of 2
wp-2183.12
2
the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners states that the Petitioners have no subsisting grievance. Accordingly, the Petition is disposed of.
(C.V. BHADANG, J )
(A.S. OKA, J )
2 of 2
Haridas M. Nayak and Anr.
State of Maharashtra
A.S. OKA
C.V. BHADANG
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
