This short order in a writ petition under Article 32/226 regarding RTI appeal regarding CDRs in the Malegaon blast case was disposed of by declining to interfere, directing the petitioner to approach the trial court instead.
Petitioner directed to prefer application before the Special MCOC Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
4.WP 2167 of 2015.doc
Vidya Amin
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2167 OF 2015
Sudhakar Omkarnath Chaturvedi Vs.
Central Information Commission & Anr.
... Petitioner
... Respondents
Mr. Prosper D'souza, Advocate appointed for the petitioner. Mr. Arfan Sait, APP for Respondent - State
CORAM: SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI & MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.
DATE: AUGUST 25, 2016
P.C.:
Heard both sides.
1 / 2
4.WP 2167 of 2015.doc
(MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) (V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.)
2 / 2
Sudhakar Omkarnath Chaturvedi
Central Information Commission
V.K. Tahilramani
Mridula Bhatkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
