The petitioner's writ petition challenging an Income Tax Appellate Tribunal order rejecting a rectification application was dismissed on withdrawal with liberty to file an appeal, subject to condonation of delay.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file an appeal under section 260A alongwith condonation of delay.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP216.16
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.216 OF 2016
Devang Lalji Shah, Mumbai 400 056 … Petitioner v/s
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai 400 020 and others … Respondents
Mr Vipul B. Joshi with Mr Nishit M. Gandhi for Petitioner. Mr Ashok N. Kotangale with Mr Arun D. Nagarjun for Respondents.
CORAM: M.S. SANKLECHA AND B.P. COLABAWALLA JJ.
DATE : 3RD MARCH, 2016
P.C.:-
1/2
VRD
WP216.16
(B.P.COLABAWALLA, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
2/2
VRD
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition challenging a rejection of rectification application under section 252(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 may be withdrawn with liberty to appeal.
3 provisions across 1 enactments
Devang Lalji Shah
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai
M.S. Sanklecha
B.P. Colabawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
