Redi Port Limited and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Order staying a judgment pronounced by the court was dismissed. No substantive legal proposition or detailed reasoning is provided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP 2134-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2134 OF 2016
REDI Port Limited & Anr. .. Petitioners V/s
State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents
Mr. D.J. Khambata, Senior Advocate with Mr. Gautam Ankad, Mr. Aditya Mehta, Mr. Vishesh Malaviya, Mr. Ashwin Bhadang and Ms. Madhavi Doshi i/b Federal & Rashmikant for the petitioners. Mr. S.G. Aney, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sanjay Jain and Mr. Ishwar Nankani, Mr. Sheelang Shah and Ms. Janaki Garde i/b Nankani Associates for respondent no.2. Mr. A.I. Patel, A.G.P. for the State.
CORAM: DR. MANJULA CHELLUR, CJ. & M.S. SONAK, J.
DATE : 14th DECEMBER 2016
P.C.:
After the judgment was pronounced in the Court, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks stay of the judgment and order. The same is rejected.
It is needless to say that in the light of disposal of the writ petition and no further interim directions being granted, the consequences will follow.
(M.S. SONAK, J.) CHIEF JUSTICE
1 of 1
ABS
REDI Port Limited & Anr.
State of Maharashtra & Anr.
Manjula Chellur
M.S. Sonak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court