The High Court disposed of the petiiton for quashing the charge sheet as the charge had already been framed during its pendency, keeping merits open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
crwp2124
1
ssp
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2124 OF 2015
Office Notes, Office
Memorandam of Coram,
appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders
Mr.Nandkumar B. Sawant for the Petitioner
Mr.K.V.Saste, APP for the State.
CORAM :A.S.OKA AND
R.D.DHANUKA,JJ.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 8, 2016
P.C.
1The prayer in this petition under
Article 226 of the Constitution of
India is for quashing the charge sheet.
The learned counsel for the petitioner
states that during the pendency of this
petition, even charge has been framed.
In view of the order of framing the
charge, at this stage, this petition
for quashing the charge sheet cannot be
entertained. Accordingly, the petition
is disposed of. All contentions on
merits are kept open.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner
State of Maharashtra
A.S. Oka
R.D. Dhanka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court