In this writ petition challenging an order dismissing a suit on limitation grounds, the petitioner was allowed to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a substantive appeal. The court expressly stated it did not examine the merits.
Petition allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file substantive appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
910.wp.2024-16.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Writ Petition NO. 2024 OF 2016
BHARAT D. PATIL
...Petitioner
Versus
RAMNIRANJAN DAGA AND ORS.
...Respondents
Mr. Onkar Warange, Advocate for the Petitioner.
CORAM : R. G. KETKAR, J.
DATE : 16th MARCH, 2016
P.C.
1 / 2
2
910.wp.2024-16.doc
( R. G. KETKAR, J.)
Deshmane (PS)
2 / 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution should be allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file substantive appeal.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
BHARAT D. PATIL
RAMNIRANJAN DAGA AND ORS.
R. G. KETKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
