Disposed

Syed Sarwat Begum Arif Husani v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC5 Aug 2016WP/1982/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Bombay High Court Bench at Aurangabad disposed of seven miscellaneous writ petitions (Nos. 1982, 3058, 7435, 3248, 2401, 2400, 2399, 2398, 3579, 3580, 2930 of 2016) filed by various residents and housing societies challengers. A bench of R.M. Borde and K.L. Wadane held that the grievances raised in these petitions do not survive and were disposed of, relying on a judgment passed on the same da

What did the court decide?

Petitions disposed of; no order as to costs; pending civil applications also disposed.

Syed Sarwat Begum Arif Husani Vs the State of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

wp198216.odt

¶2

{1}

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

(1) WRIT PETITION NO. 1982 OF 2016

¶5

Syed Sarwat Begum w/o Arif Husani age 44 years, occ. Household R/o House No. 8.5.107, Shabazar, Aurangabad, Tq. & Dist. Aurangabad Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

01 The State of Maharashtra Through Urban Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai 400 032.

¶8

02 The Secretary, Urban Development Department -1, Mantralaya, Mumbai 400 032.

¶9

03 The Director of Town Planning Central Building Pune

¶10

04 Joint Director of Town Planning Aurangabad

¶11

05 Dy. Director of Town Planning Development Plan Special Unit Aurangabad

¶12

06 Aurangabad Municipal Corporation Aurangabad Through Commissioner

¶13

07 The Mayor, Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad

¶14

08 The Municipal Corporation Aurangabad Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad Respondents

¶15

wp198216.odt

¶16

{2}

¶17

Mr.D.P.Palodkar, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.A.B.Girase, Government Pleader for Respondents No.1 to 5. Mr.Vijaysingh Thorat, Senior Counsel i/by Shri J.R.Shah, advocate for Respondents No.6 and 8. Mr.A.M.Karad, advocate for Respondent No.7.

¶18

WITH

¶19

(2) WRIT PETITION NO. 3058 OF 2016

¶20

01 Ashok Haridas Suradkar age 57 years, occ. Service R/o Plot No. 1, New Nandanvan Colony, Aurangabad.

¶21

02 Madhukar Dagduji Kale age 58 years, Occ. Retired R/o Plot No. 2, New Nandanvan Colony, Aurangabad.

¶22

03 Shaikh Moinoddin Naziroddin age 60 years, occ. Pensioner R/o Plot No. 5, New Nandanvan Colony, Aurangabad.

¶23

04 Vasant Chintaman Kamble age 57 years, occ. Service R/o Plot No. 6, New Nndanvan Colony, Aurangabad.

¶24

05 Smt. Indrayani Nagbhooshan Naidu age 70 years, occ. Pensioner r/o Plot No. 8, New Nandanvan Colony, Aurangabad.

¶25

06 Smt. Vilasani Narayan Nair age 60 years, occ. Household R/o Plot No. 7, New Nandanvan Colony, Aurangabad

¶26

07 Smt. Kamal Pundlik Suradkar age 62 years, occ. Household R/o Plot No. 5, New Nandanvan Colony,

¶27

wp198216.odt

¶28

{3}

¶29

	Aurangabad
08	Shaikh Raisoddin Nziroddin age 50 years, Occ. Service R/o Plot No. 4, New Nandanvan Colony, Auragabad.
09	Manoj Anthony Mulavana age 42 years, occ. Service R/o Plot No. 3, New Nandanvan Colony, Aurangabad.
10	Sujit Vishwanath Motghare age 60 years, occ. Household R/o Plot No. 7, New Nandanvan Colony, Aurangabad. Petitioners
	Versus
01	The State of Maharashtra Through Urban Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai 400 032.
02	The Secretary, Urban Development Department -1, Mantralaya, Mumbai 400 032.
03	The Director of Town Planning Central Building Pune
04	Joint Director of Town Planning Aurangabad
05	Dy. Director of Town Planning Development Plan Special Unit Aurangabad
06	Aurangabad Municipal Corporation Aurangabad Through Commissioner

¶30

wp198216.odt

¶31

07 The Mayor, Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad

¶32

08 The Municipal Corporation Aurangabad Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad Respondents

¶33

¶34

WITH (3) WRIT PETITION NO. 7435 OF 2016

¶35

01 Sau Shakuntala Shankarlal Korodiwal age 69 years, occ. Business r/o Plot No. 29, Bhagwati Colony, Near Jawahar Colony, Aurangabad

¶36

02 Suresh Appasaheb Jadhav age 50 years, occ. Service r/o Plot No. 65/66, Survey No. 46, Rajgurunagar, Shahnoorwadi, Aurangabad.

¶37

03 Rajendra Ramdas Patil age 47 years, occ. Business r/o Samarth Automobiles, Jawahar Colony, Aurangabad. 04 Smt Sudha yashwantrao Patil age 69 years, occ. Household r/o Plot No. 16, Shriramnagar, Jawahar Colony, Aurangabad.

¶38

05 Sau Hemlata Gajanan Late

¶39

	{5} wp198216.odt
	age 33 years, occ. Household r/o Sawad, Tal Risod, Dist. Washim
06	Smt Jogindarkaur Sarjeetsing Jabinda age 62 years, occ. Pensioner r/o 59, Dashmeshnagar, Aurangabad.
07	Gurupratapsingh Sarjeetsingh Jabinda age 36 years, occ. Business r/o 59, Dashmeshnagar, Aurangabad.
08	Rajpalsingh Sarjeetsingh Jabinda age 35 years, occ. Business r/o 59, Dashmeshnagar, Aurangabad.
09	Kailas Shankarlal Karodiwal age 38 years, occ. Business r/o Plot No. 29, Bhagwati Colony, Aurangabad.
10	Yogesh Shankarlal Karodiwal age 35 years, occ. Business r/o Plot no. 29, Bhagwati Colony, Aurangabad.
11	Dr. Dnyaneshwar Chandrabhan Zade age 34 years, occ.Medical Practitioner r/o Plot No. 40, Sahakar Nagar, Aurangabad. Petitioners
	Versus
01	The State of Maharashtra Through Urban Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai 400 032.
02	The Secretary, Urban Development Department -1, Mantralaya,

wp198216.odt

{6}

Mumbai 400 032.

03 The Director of Town Planning Central Building Pune

¶44

04 Joint Director of Town Planning Aurangabad

¶45

05 Dy. Director of Town Planning Development Plan Special Unit Aurangabad

¶46

06 Aurangabad Municipal Corporation Aurangabad Through Commissioner

¶47

07 The Mayor, Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad

¶48

08 The Municipal Corporation Aurangabad Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad Respondents

¶49

¶50

Mr.A.M.Karad, advocate for Respondent No.7.

¶51

WITH

¶52

(4) WRIT PETITION NO. 3248 OF 2016

¶53

Shri Vitthalrao Rangnathrao Ambarwadikar age 68 years, occ. Business & Agril. R/o 212 Samarthnagar, Aurangabad Dist. Aurangabad

¶54

Petitioner

¶55

Versus

¶56

01 The State of Maharashtra

¶57

{7} wp198216.odt

¶58

	Through its Secretary Urban Development Department Mantralaya, Mumbai 32.
02	The Director of Town Planning Aurangabad
03	The Deputy Director of Town Planning Aurangabad
04	Aurangabad Municipal Corporation Through its Commissioner
05	Assistant director of Town Planning Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad
06	Joint Director of Town Planning Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad
07	Deputy Director of Town Planning (Special unit) Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad Respondents
Mr. Mr.A Mr.V for R	V. D. Sapkal, advocate for the petitioner. .B.Girase, Government Pleader for Respondents No.1 to 4. ijaysingh Thorat, Senior Counsel i/by Shri J.R.Shah, advocate espondents No.6.

¶59

Mr.A.M.Karad, advocate for Respondents 5, 6 & 7.

¶60

WITH

¶61

(5) WRIT PETITION NO. 2401 OF 2016

¶62

Smt. Hazirabee w/o Ahemadkhan age 62 years, occ. Household & Agril r/o Satara Parisar, Aurangabad Tq. & Dist. Aurangabad Petitioner

¶63

Versus

¶64

01 The State of Maharashtra Through its Secretary, Urban Development Department

¶65

	{8}	wp198216.odt
	Mantralaya, Mumbai 32.
02	The Director of Town Planning Aurangabad
03	The Deputy Director of Town Planning Aurangabad
04	Aurangabad Municipal Corporation Through its Commissioner
05	Assistant Director of Town Planning Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad
06	Joint Director of Town Planning Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad
07	Assistant Director of Town Planning Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad
08	Deputy Director of Town Planning (Special Unit) Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad	Respondents
Mr. Mr. Mr. for	V.D. Sapkal, advocate for petitioner. A.B. Girase, Government Pleader for Respo Vijaysingh Thorat, Senior Counsel i/by Mr. Respondents 6 & 8.	ndents 1 to 3. J.R. Shah, advocate

¶66

Mr. A.M. Karad, advocate for Respondent no. 4.

¶67

WITH

¶68

(6) WRIT PETITION NO. 2400 OF 2016

¶69

01 Nazir Khan s/o Rahim Khan age 50 years, Occ.Agriculturist R/o Afwan Colony, Aurangabad Dist. Aurangabad. 02 Nasir Khan s/o Rahim Khan Age 45 years, Occ. Business R/o Afwan Colony, Aurangabad Dist. Aurangabad

¶70

	{9}	wp198216.odt
03	Nasim Khan S/o Rahim Khan Age 45 years, Occ. Business R/o Afwan Colony, Aurangabad Dist. Aurangabad
04	Rashid Khan S/o Rahim Khan Age 32 years, Occ. Business R/o Afwan Colony, Aurangabad Dist. Aurangabad	Petitioners
	Versus
01	The State of Maharashtra Through its Secretary, urban Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai 32.
02	The Director of Town Planning Aurangabad
03	The Deputy Director of Town Planning Aurangabad
04	Aurangabad Municipal Corporation through its Commissioner
05	Assistant Director of Town Planning Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad
06	Joint Director of Town Planning Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad
07	Assistant Director of Town Planning, Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad
08	Deputy Director of Town Planning (Special Unit) Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad.

¶71

Mr. V.D. Sapkal, advocate for petitioner. Mr. A.B. Girase, Government Pleader for Respondents 1 to 3. Mr. Vijaysingh Thorat, Senior Counsel i/by Mr. J.R. Shah, advocate for Respondents 6 & 8. Mr. A.M. Karad, advocate for Respondent no. 4.

wp198216.odt

{10}

WITH

(7) WRIT PETITION NO. 2399 OF 2016

¶76

Smt. (Amb	Gangabai Vitthalrao Ghuge arwadikar)
Age 6 R/o	5 years, Occ. Business & Agril. 212 Samarthnagar, Aurangabad
Dist.	Aurangabad.	Petitioner
	Versus
01	The State of Maharashtra Through its Secretary, Urban Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai
02	The director of Town Planning Aurangabad.
03	The Deputy Director of Town Planning Aurangabad.
04	Aurangabad Municipal Corporation Through its Commissioner
05	Assistant Director of Town Planning Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad
06	Joint Director of Town Planning Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad
07	Assistant Director of Town Planning Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad
08	Deputy Director of Town Planning (Special Unit) Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad.	Respondents

¶77

Mr. V.D. Sapkal, advocate for petitioner.

¶78

Mr. A.B. Girase, Government Pleader for Respondents 1 to 3, 6 & 8.

¶79

wp198216.odt

¶80

{11}

¶81

Mr. Vijaysingh Thorat, Senior Counsel i/by Mr. J.R. Shah, advocate for Respondents 6 & 8.

¶82

Mr. A.M. Karad, advocate for Respondent no. 4.

¶83

WITH

¶84

(8) WRIT PETITION NO. 2398 OF 2016

¶85

Shri Vinod S/o Gangabishan Agrawal Age 49 years, Occ. Contractor R/o C-1, Pride Park, Vedant Nagar Aurangabad, Dist. Aurangabad. Petitioner

¶86

	Versus
01	The State of Maharashtra Through its Secretary, Urban Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai 32.
02	The Director of Town Planning Aurangabad
03	The Deputy Director of Town Planning Aurangabad
04	Aurangabad Municipal Corporation Through its Commissioner
05	Assistant Director of Town Planning Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad	} } }
06	Joint Director of Town Planning Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad	} } } Deleted
07	Assistant Director of Town Planning Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad	} } }
08	Deputy Director of Town Planning (Special Unit) Municipal Corporation Aurangabad	} } } Respondents

¶87

Mr. V.D. Sapkal, advocate for petitioner.

¶88

{12}

¶89

wp198216.odt

¶90

Mr. A.B. Girase, Government Pleader for Respondents 1 to 3. Mr. A.M. Karad, advocate for Respondent no. 4. Respondent nos. 5 to 8 deleted.

¶91

WITH

¶92

(9) WRIT PETITION NO. 3579 OF 2016

¶93

Shaikh Babu Shaikh Rajmohammad age 46 years, Occ. Business R/o Chikalthana, Aurangabad Tq. & Dist. Aurangabad. Petitioner

¶94

Versus

¶95

01 The State of Maharashtra Through Urban Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai 400 032.

¶96

02 The Secretary, Urban Development Department -1, Mantralaya, Mumbai 400 032.

¶97

03 The Director of Town Planning Central Building Pune

¶98

04 Joint Director of Town Planning Aurangabad

¶99

05 Dy. Director of Town Planning Development Plan Special Unit Aurangabad

¶100

06 Aurangabad Municipal Corporation Aurangabad Through Commissioner

¶101

07 The Mayor, Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad

¶102

{13}

¶103

wp198216.odt

¶104

08 The Municipal Corporation Aurangabad Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad

¶105

Respondents

¶106

Mr.Yogesh P. Deshmukh, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.A.B.Girase, Government Pleader for Respondents No.1 to 5. Mr.Vijaysingh Thorat, Senior Counsel i/by Shri J.R.Shah, advocate for Respondents No.6 and 8. Mr.A.M.Karad, advocate for Respondent No.7.

¶107

WITH

¶108

(10) WRIT PETITION NO. 3580 OF 2016

¶109

Kanchannagar Sahakari Gruhnirman Sanstha Ltd. Scheme – C, Nakshtrawadi, Aurangabad Through its Secretary Shri D.B. Josalkar Petitioner

¶110

Versus

¶111

01 The State of Maharashtra Through Urban Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai 400 032.

¶112

02 The Secretary, Urban Development Department -1, Mantralaya, Mumbai 400 032.

¶113

03 The Director of Town Planning Central Building Pune

¶114

04 Joint Director of Town Planning Aurangabad

¶115

05 Dy. Director of Town Planning Development Plan Special Unit Aurangabad

¶116

wp198216.odt

¶117

{14}

¶118

06 Aurangabad Municipal Corporation Aurangabad Through Commissioner

¶119

07 The Mayor, Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad

¶120

08 The Municipal Corporation Aurangabad Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad Respondents

¶121

¶122

WITH

¶123

(11) WRIT PETITION NO. 2930 OF 2016

¶124

Krishna Sahakari Gruhanirman Sanstha Maryadit, Mitmita, Tq. & dist. Aurangabad Through its Secretary Shri Deorao Bhikaji Goje age 70 years, occ. Retired R/o Ajabnagar, Aurangabad Petitioner

¶125

Versus

¶126

01 The State of Maharashtra Through the Secretary Urban Development Department Mantralaya, Mumbai 400 032.

¶127

02 The Director, Town Planning, Central Building, Pune

¶128

03 The Joint Director Town Planning, Aurangabad

¶129

{15} wp198216.odt

¶130

04 The Dy. Director Town Planning, Development Plant, Special unit, Aurangabad

¶131

05 The Municipal Corporation Aurangabad Through Commissioner

¶132

06 The Mayor, The Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad

¶133

07 The Municipal Commissioner Municipal Corporation, Auranagabad. Respondents

¶134

Mr.V.B.Kale, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.A.B.Girase, Government Pleader for Respondents No.1 to 4. Mr.Vijaysingh Thorat, Senior Counsel i/by Shri J.R.Shah, advocate for Respondents No.5 and 7. Mr.A.M.Karad, advocate for Respondent No.6.

¶135

CORAM : R.M.BORDE &

¶136

K.L.WADANE, JJ. Reserved on : 20^th July, 2016 Pronounced on : 5^th August, 2016.

¶137

JUDGMENT (Per R.M.Borde, J.):

¶138

1 Heard. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally by consent of learned Counsel for respective parties.

¶139

2 For the reasons recorded in the judgment passed by us today in Writ Petition No.1981 of 2016, grievance raised by the respective petitioners does not survive and these petitions, as

¶140

wp198216.odt

¶141

such, stand disposed of.

¶142

3 Rule accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶143

Pending Civil Applications, if any, do not survive and stand disposed of.

K.L.WADANE

JUDGE

R.M.BORDE

JUDGE

adb/wp198216

Syed Sarwat Begum Arif Husani v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Syed Sarwat Begum Arif Husani v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohini Ramchandra Kamble Vs Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee Aurangabad and Others

Sayed Bashir Ali Sayed Ali and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Kerabai Laxman Herke and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Kushal Dinkar Badgujar Vs Rajaram Nago Chavan and Others

Abdul Gani Khairulla Chaudhary Died Thr Its Lrs Maimuna Begum and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Govind Bajirao Navpute Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others