Disposed
Patil Suresh Kautik and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Bombay HCWP/1961/2007
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
wp.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
{1}
1961.07 wp.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 1961 OF 2007
Patil Suresh Kautik and others. vs. The State of Maharashtra and another.
Advocate for petitioner : Mr. Subodh P. Shah. AGP for the Respondent: Mr. S.M. Ganachari.
CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA & K.K. SONAWANE, JJ. DATE : 7TH JUNE , 2016.
PER COURT:
1] Mr. Shah, learned counsel on instruction of the petitioner states that the purpose of filing the writ petition is served. In light of that, writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
[K.K. SONWANE] [S.V. GANGAPURWALA] JUDGE JUDGE.
grt/-
Patil Suresh Kautik and others
The State of Maharashtra and another
S.V. Gangapurwala
K.K. Sonawane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court