The Court disposed of a writ petition regarding elections in a cooperative society. It held that with preparations complete, the State must decide expeditiously on holding elections and declined to adjudicate interim extensions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
910 WRIT PETITION NO. 1934 OF 2016
ARUN BABASAHEB DAKE AND OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Kale Ajeet B. GP for Respondents:Mr. A.B. Girase
... CORAM : R. M. BORDE & A. I. S. CHEEMA, JJ. Date: February 17, 2016
PER COURT :-
1 It is informed that, the term of the managing committee is over and that, the preparations in respect of holding of elections to the society are completed. In these circumstances, the State shall take decision in respect of holding of elections expeditiously. So far as the appointment of administrator or administrative body or extension of term of the existing managing committee is concerned, since no decision has yet been taken by the State, we do not propose to deal with the issue raised in that regard in the instant petition. It would be open for the petitioner to approach this Court in regard to aforesaid issue as and when cause of action accrues.
( A. I. S. CHEEMA, J. ) ( R. M. BORDE, J. )
vbd
Arun Babasaheb Dake
State of Maharashtra
R. M. Borde
A. I. S. Cheema
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
