The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Appellate Bench) dismissed the writ petition. The court held that the petitioner failed to comply with a prior direction to add appointees as parties, preventing consideration of the grievance.
Petitioner's grievance not considered due to non-compliance; Writ Petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
W.P.No.1911/05
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.1911 OF 2005
Vijaykumar S/o Ramrao Kotapalle Vs. The Zilla Parishad, Nanded and others.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Court's or Judge's orders
Mr.U.R.Awate, advocate holding for Mr.S.B.Talekar, advocate for the petitioner.
Mr.V.S.Panpatte, advocate for Respondent Nos.1 to 3 absent.
CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA AND K.L.WADANE,JJ. Date : 15.10.2016.
PER COURT :
2
(K.L.WADANE,J.) (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.)
Dt.15.10.2016. asp/office/wp1911.05
3
W.P.No.1911/05
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petitioner is entitled to a direction to add appointees as parties to the petition after failing to comply with a previous order.
Vijaykumar S/o Ramrao Kotapalle
The Zilla Parishad, Nanded
S.V.Gangapurwala
K.L.Wadane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
