The High Court at Bombay granted leave to withdraw the writ petition and dismissed it as withdrawn, keeping all merits and contentions open without adjudication.
Leave to withdraw the petition granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP 1900.12
Sr.No.915
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1900 OF 2012
Shri Tilekar Dnyanoba Maruti ….Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra and ors. …Respondents
Mr. V. K. Bobhare, advocate for the petitioner. Mr. V. M. Mali, AGP for the State.
Mr. R. P. Saroj, advocate for respondent No.5.
CORAM : RANJIT MORE &
ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.
DATE : 20th JULY, 2016.
P. C. :
Mr. V. K. Bobhare, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition in view of the order dated 20th January, 2014 passed by the Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Pune, with liberty to file a fresh petition challenging the said order. Leave with liberty as prayed for, is granted. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.) [RANJIT MORE, J.]
Shubhada S Kadam 1/1
Shri Tilekar Dnyanoba Maruti
The State of Maharashtra
Ranjit More
Anuja Prabhudesai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
