The petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition. The court accorded leave and disposed of the writ petition as withdrawn with liberty to file appropriate proceedings.
Leave granted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file appropriate proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
901-OSWP1890-14.DOC
AGK
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1890 OF 2014
Sarita Bisure
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & 5 Ors.
…Petitioner
…Respondents
Ms. Shefali Basin, i/b Mr. Achyut G. Pandit, for the Petitioner.
Ms. Madhubala Kejale, AGP, for Respondent No.1-State.
Mr. Ajit Ram Pitale, for Respondent No. 5.
CORAM:S.C. DHARMADHIKARI &
G.S. PATEL, JJ.
DATED:13th January 2016
PC:-
1.After the matter was heard for some time, on instructions
from the Petitioner who is present in Court, learned Advocate for
the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty
to file appropriate proceedings. Leave granted. The Writ Petition is
disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)(S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
1 of 1
Sarita Bisure
The State of Maharashtra
The other 5 Respondents
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI
G.S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court