Petitioner challenged order declining revisional jurisdiction; court found petition rendered infructuous due to prior order in related writ petition and disposed with no order as costs.
Petition disposed; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DSS
906-wp-1838-14
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1838 OF 2014
Vilas L. Apte .. Petitioner vs. The State of Maharashtra and ors. .. Respondents
Mrs Anjali Neel Helekar h/f. Mr. Neel Helekar for the Petitioner. Ms Vaishali Nimbalkar, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. Mr. Aditya Aklekar h/f. Mr. Rahul Kadam for Respondent Nos.4 to 16 and 18.
CORAM : M. S. SONAK, J. DATE : 28 JULY 2016.
P.C. :-
1] The challenge in this petition is to the order dated 12 December 2013 made by the Joint Charity Commissioner, Pune in Revision Application No. 25 of 2013.
2] In Revision Application No.25 of 2013 instituted by the petitioner, the challenge was to the order dated 16 September 2012 made by the Deputy Charity Commissioner Pune in Inquiry Application No. 1317 of 2010.
3] By the impugned order dated 12 December 2013, the Joint Charity Commissioner has declined to exercise revisional jurisdiction, inter alia, on the ground that no such revision was
1/2
DSS
906-wp-1838-14
maintainable as against the order dated 16 September 2012. Mrs. Anjali Helekar, learned counsel for the petitioner, points out that this Court by its order dated 12 January 2015 in Writ Petition No. 8609 of 2014 has, in fact, set aside the order dated 16 September 2012 and issued further directions in the matter of disposal of the proceedings before the Deputy Charity Commissioner.
dinesh
2/2
Vilas L. Apte
The State of Maharashtra
M. S. Sonak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
