Court granted liberty to petitioner to withdraw the writ petition while it remained pending to allow amendment of the plaint in the concurrent civil suit.
liberty to withdraw the writ petition. It is entirely for the Civil Court to take note of any amendment application and decide it on its own merit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
suresh
908-WPL-1761.2016.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION {L} NO.1761 OF 2016
Sonal Nathram Ajna .... Petitioner Vs. Maharashtra Housing & Area Development Authority & Anr. .... Respondents
Mr. Purushottam N. Kulkarni for the Petitioner. Mr. Girish D. Utangale i/by M/s. Utangale & Co. for Respondent Nos.1 & 2.
CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ.
DATE : JULY 27, 2016
P.C:
City Civil Court. In view thereof and the Suit being pending, the petitioner's Advocate seeks liberty to withdraw this writ petition.
He seeks this liberty so that steps can be taken to seek an amendment to the plaint to incorporate the subsequent events.
suresh
908-WPL-1761.2016.doc
Court. It is entirely for the Civil Court to take note of any amendment application and decide it on its own merit and in accordance with law, uninfluenced by any liberty granted by this Court.
Page 2 of 2
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sonal Nathram Ajna
Maharashtra Housing & Area Development Authority
Anr.
S.C. Dhar madhikari
Dr. Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
