The petition granted liberty to withdraw, taking all rights and contentions open for appeal under Section 35 of the Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, and stayed forcible eviction for one week.
Liberty granted to withdraw petition with rights saved; forbearance from eviction for one week.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wpl 1996-2016.doc
1/1
sat
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 1996 OF 2016
Ravi D. Shinde
...Petitioner
vs.
State of Maharashtra & Anr.
....Respondents
Mr.Bhushan Deshmukh with Ashish Gatagat and Vishesh Kalra i/b. Vidhi Partners for Petitioner. Mr.U.S. Upadhyay, AGP for Respondents.
CORAM : S.C. GUPTE, J.
26 JULY 2016
P.C. :
Considering the fact that there is an alternative remedy, namely, appeal under Section 35 to the Additional Collector, learned Counsel for the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition keeping all rights and contentions open.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Liberty to the Petitioner to raise all the grounds of challenge forming part of the present petition before the appellate forum under Section 35 of Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971. In the meantime, for a period of one week from today, the authority shall not take any steps for forcible eviction or demolition of the Petitioner's structure.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ravi D. Shinde
State of Maharashtra
S.C. Gupte
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
