Disposed

Dargah Hazrat Khaja Muntajiboddin Zar Zarri Zar Baksh through Its President Shaikh Munibuddin M v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC24 Oct 2016WP/1745/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of writ petition 1745/2016 as withdrawn by the petitioner, who received instructions to withdraw the plea as the State was considering appointing a permanent Chief Executive Officer.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed as withdrawn; all connected civil applications also disposed.

What the court decided

Dargah Hazrat Khaja Muntajiboddin Zar Zarri Zar… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

- 1 -

¶2

WP 1745/2016

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶4

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO.1745/2016

¶6

 Dargah Hazrat Khaja Muntajiboddin Zar-zarri Zar
 Baksh Dulhe Rahe.

¶7

 ...Petitioner..

¶8

Versus

¶9

 The State of Maharashtra & others.

¶10

 ...Respondents...

¶11

 .....

¶12

Shri R.R.Mantri, Advocate for petitioner.

¶13

Shri A.B.Girase, Government Pleader for the Respondent
nos.1 & 2.

¶14

Shri V.J.Dixit, Sr.Advocate i/b Shri.S.V.Dixit, Advocate
for Respondent Nos.3 & 4.

¶15

 .....

¶16

CORAM: S.V. GANGAPURWALA &
 K.L. WADANE, JJ.

¶17

DATE: 24.10.2016

¶18

ORDER :

¶19

1]Miss.Pradnya Talekar, learned counsel states that

¶20

office of Shri S.B. Talekar has given no objection to the
petitioner for engaging another Advocate.

¶21

2]Shri R.R. Mantri, learned counsel appears on behalf

¶22

of the petitioner and states that he is instructed to

¶23

appear for the petitioner. He has filed Vakalatnama

¶24

WP 1745/2016

¶25

also. The learned counsel further states that he has
been instructed by the petitioner to withdraw the writ
petition as the State is considering the appointment of a

¶26

permanent Chief Executive Officer. The said

¶27

communication is produced by learned counsel Shri R.R.
Mantri. The same is taken on record and marked as 'X'
for identification.

¶28

3]The learned Government Pleader submits that the

¶29

process of appointing permanent Chief Executive Officer
is at final stage.

¶30

4]In the light of above, writ petition is disposed of
as withdrawn. No costs. All civil applications also
stand disposed of in view of disposal of writ petition.

¶31

ndk/ c24101635.doc

Dargah Hazrat Khaja Muntajiboddin Zar Zarri Zar Baksh through Its President Shaikh Munibuddin M v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Dargah Hazrat Khaja Muntajiboddin Zar Zarri Zar Baksh through Its President Shaikh Munibuddin M v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pandurang Bapurao Garad Vs the State of Maharshtra and Ors.

Namdeo Sahadu Dhadge Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Sudamrao Govindrao Khose and Others Vs Jagannath Narhari Khose and Others

Bharat Premchand Chaudhari Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Eknath Ganpatrao Shinde Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bhanyabapu Suryabhan Sahane Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others