In this criminal writ petition, the petitioner contended that an offence was made out but the FIR was not registered. The court noted an affidavit confirming the FIR was registered, and thus, the petition served its purpose.
null
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp174-16.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR .
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION No.174 OF 2016
Mohammad Khalid Kamal Ansari
Vs.
The Director General of Anti Corruption Bureau and others.
_______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders.
Mr. R.P. Joshi, advocate for petitioner. Mr. Mirza, APP for respondents.
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND V.M. DESHPANDE, JJ.
DATED : 8 th AUGUST, 2016
Heard.
The petition has been filed with the contention that though the offence was made out, the First Information Report was not registered.
An affidavit has been filed by the Police Inspector, ACB, Nagpur, stating that First Information Report has already been registered under section 7 of the Anti Corruption Act, 1988 at Kanhan Police Station. It is further stated that during investigation if more accused are found to be involved in this crime, they will also be impleaded as accused in the case.
In that view of the matter, we find that the petition has served it purpose. Petition is disposed of as such.
JUDGE JUDGE
Hirekhan
wp174-16.odt
2
CERTIFICATE
I certify that this Judgment uploaded is a true and correct copy of original signed Order.
Uploaded by : R.B. Hirekhan. P.A.
Uploaded on:09-08-2016.
Mohammad Khalid Kamal Ansari
The Director General of Anti Corruption Bureau
B.R. GAVAI
V.M. DESHPANDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
