Disposed

Shweta Madhavrao Shingarwad v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC10 Feb 2016WP/1730/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Five petitioners from the Scheduled Tribe category filed writ petitions seeking protection from debarment in the medical entrance examination while their tribe certificate validation was pending before the Scrutiny Committee. The Court directed the State to forward exam forms to the University and permitted petitioners to appear for the examination.

What did the court decide?

Directed respondent no. 2 to forward examination forms to University; directed University to permit petitioners to appear for examination.

Shweta Madhavrao Shingarwad Vs the State of… — Education and Admissions | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

wp1728.16.doc

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO. 1728 OF 2016

¶5

Komal d/o Dattatraya Bhosale .. PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & others .. RESPONDENTS Mr. S.M. Vibhute, advocate for petitioner. Mr. B.V. Virdhe, AGP for the State. Mr. C.A. Jadhav, advocate for respondent no. 3.

¶6

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1729 OF 2016

¶7

Sandhyarani d/o Shankarrao Pupalwar .. PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & others .. RESPONDENTS Mr. S.M. Vibhute, advocate for petitioner. Mr. B.V. Virdhe, AGP for the State. Mr. C.A. Jadhav, advocate for respondent no. 3. WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1730 OF 2016 Shweta d/o Madhavrao shingarwad .. PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & others .. RESPONDENTS Mr. S.M. Vibhute, advocate for petitioner. Mr. B.V. Virdhe, AGP for the State. Mr. C.A. Jadhav, advocate for respondent no. 3.

¶8

wp1728.16.doc

¶9

¶10

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1731 OF 2016

¶11

Prashant s/o Narsimlu Mokmod .. PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & others .. RESPONDENTS Mr. S.M. Vibhute, advocate for petitioner. Mr. B.V. Virdhe, AGP for the State. Mr. C.A. Jadhav, advocate for respondent no. 3.

¶12

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1732 OF 2016

¶13

Seema d/o Diliprao Kurewad .. PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & others .. RESPONDENTS Mr. S.M. Vibhute, advocate for petitioner. Mr. B.V. Virdhe, AGP for the State. Mr. C.A. Jadhav, advocate for respondent no. 3.

¶14

=====

¶15

CORAM : R.M. BORDE & A.I.S. CHEEMA, JJ. DATE : 10^th FEBRUARY, 2016.

¶16

PER COURT :

¶17

Heard.

¶18

Petitioners belong to Scheduled Tribe category and have been admitted to medical course as against the seat earmarked for the aforesaid reserved category. The tribe certificates issued to petitioners have been tendered for verification to the Scrutiny Committee and the proposals are

¶19

wp1728.16.doc

¶20

¶21

pending. This Court has already issued directions on 26.06.2015 to the Scrutiny Committee to take decision on the proposals within a period of one year. In the meanwhile, the University has directed the concerned colleges not to accept application forms for examination from petitioners since they have failed to tender validation certificate. Petitioners, apprehending that they would be debarred from appearing the examination, have approached this Court seeking protection order.

¶22

In the facts and circumstances of the case, respondent no. 2 is directed to accept and forward examination forms pertaining to petitioners to respondent no. 3 - University and, the University is directed to permit petitioners to appear for the examination. Since direction has already been issued to the Scrutiny Committee to take decision on the tribe certificate validation proposals, no further orders are necessary in that regard.

¶23

With directions as above, writ petitions stand disposed of.

¶24

( A.I.S. CHEEMA ) ( R. M. BORDE ) JUDGE JUDGE

¶25

dyb

Shweta Madhavrao Shingarwad v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shweta Madhavrao Shingarwad v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Durgamata Mahila Bachat Gat Bhivpur 2 Dist Jalna through Its President and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

M/S Vishal Intelligence Security Services through Its Proprietor Dinkar Namdeo Chaudhari Vs the North Maharashtra University Jalgaon through Its Vice Chancellor and Others

Pandurang Wanji Sonwane Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Anil Hilal Kunwar and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Babulal Bhika Mali and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Prashant Narsimlu Mokmod Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others