Keshav Sakharam Utekar v. State of Maharashtra and 10 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
A list case where the matter was not on board. The court extended the time to amend the petition by one week due to urgency and took the matter up in the production board. No substantive decision was recorded.
What did the court decide?
Time to amend extended by one week; matter taken up in production board.
What the court decided
906.wp 1725.6.doc
Urmila Ingale
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1725 OF 2016
Keshav Sakharam Utekar .. Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors. .. Respondents
Ms.Sadhana Mahashabde, for the Petitioner. Mr.Mohit Jadhav, AGP for State.
CORAM : SHANTANU.S.KEMKAR &
M.S.KARNIK, JJ. DATE : 21st SEPTEMBER, 2016
P.C. :
- . Matter is not on board. In view of urgency, taken up
in the production board.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Keshav Sakharam Utekar
- respondent
State of Maharashtra
Coram
Shantanu S. Kemkar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
The Municipal Corporation of City of Thane, through Commissioner Vs Shreeniwas Waman Oka and Ors.
Shri. Babaso Dhondiram Powar and Ors. Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Mangala Raghunath Sawale Vs State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary, Tribal Development Dept. and Ors.
Aftab Alam Khan Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.