The appellate side transferred a writ petition under Article 226 to the original side in Bombay High Court, finding the entire cause of action arose in Mumbai.
Transfer of the writ petition to the Original Side.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
skn 1/1 1607.16-wp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
WRIT PETITION NO. 1607 OF 2016
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of appearances, Court's or Judge's orders Court's orders or directions & Registrar’s orders.
Jitendra M. Patil for the petitioner. V.B.Thadani, AGP for respondent No.1.
CORAM : A.S. OKA AND C.V.BHADANG, JJ DATED : 5th February 2016.
P.C.:
Not on board. Taken up on board.
(C.V. BHADANG, J)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the entire cause of action for the writ petition arose in Mumbai.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner
Respondent No.1
A. S. Oka
C. V. Bhadang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
