Partly allowed
Suryakant Chandrakant Gade and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra.
Bombay HCWP/1591/2016
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The High Court of Bombay held that since the Divisional Commissioner granted parole to petitioner no.1, the grievance regarding him is redressed and the petition concerning him is dismissed. For petitioner no.2 who did not apply, liberty was granted to apply for parole.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed regarding petitioner no.1; liberty granted to petitioner no.2 to apply for parole and authority directed to decide within two days.