Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioners and their advocate were absent from the hearing after multiple listings.
Petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP.1585.2014.7.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1585 OF 2014
Dr. Suresh Chandra Gupta } and Ors. } Petitioners versus Union of India and Ors. } Respondents
Mr. Shashank N. Fadia for the Petitioners Absent .
Mr. Vijay Kantharia with Mr. Mohamedali Chunawale and Mr. Dhanesh Shah for Respondent No. 1.
CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & G. S. PATEL, JJ.
DATED :- JANUARY 8, 2016
P.C. :-
The Petitioners and their Advocate both are absent.
Their names are correctly displayed on the Board. The Petition has been listed on several occasions prior to this date. In these circumstances, it is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(G.S.PATEL, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Page 1 of 1
J.V.Salunke,PA
Dr. Suresh Chandra Gupta and Ors.
Union of India and Ors.
S. C. Dharmadikari
G. S. Patel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
