Jignasa J. Parikh v. the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the termination of the petitioner's services. Relying on Rule 20 of the Right to Education Rules, the court held that an efficacious remedy was available through an appeal to the School Tribunal.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition dismissed on the ground of alternate efficacious remedy being available before the School Tribunal.