Criminal Writ Petition seeking parole petition. Court denied immediate parole. Directed authorities to decide pending appeal within four weeks. Petitioner permitted to file fresh writ if appeal fails. Case disposed of.
Petitioner directed to consider appeal within four weeks; request for parole rejected at this stage; rule discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sherla V.
wp.1511.2016_8.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1511 OF 2016
Sachin Janardan Kamble ... Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
Mr.Yashpal Thakur, Advocate appointed for the Petitioner Mrs.U.V. Kejriwal, APP, for Respondent – State
CORAM: SMT.V.K. TAHILRAMANI & MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.
DATE: JULY 12, 2016
ORAL ORDER (PER SMT.V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.):
1 / 2
wp.1511.2016_8.doc
to direct the authorities to consider the appeal of the petitioner and decide the same, if not already decided, within a period of four weeks from the date of communication of the order. In case, the appeal is decided against the petitioner, it would be open for him to prefer a fresh writ petition challenging the order dismissing the appeal as well as the earlier order of rejection.
2 / 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should grant parole to a petitioner whose application was previously rejected, or direct authorities to expedite the appeal process.
Sachin Janardan Kamble
The State of Maharashtra
V.K. TAHILRAMANI
MRIDULA BHATKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
