In a writ petition against the Slum Rehabilitation Authority, the petitioner's counsel stated that the petition should be withdrawn. The court allowed the withdrawal and disposed of the matter accordingly.
Writ Petition allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of as such.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
40-OSWP1491-15.DOC
AGK
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1491 OF 2015
Ramesh Nishad
Versus
…Petitioner
The Slum Rehabilitation Authority & 5 Ors.…Respondents
Mr. Angad Giri, with Mr. Sagar Batavia, for the Petitioner.
None for the Respondents.
CORAM:S.C. DHARMADHIKARI &
G.S. PATEL, JJ.
DATED:8th January 2016
PC:-
1.Mr. Giri, on instructions, states that the Writ Petition be
allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of as such.
2. In view of the statement of Mr. Giri, the Writ Petition is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of as such.
(G. S. PATEL, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
1 of 1
Ramesh Nishad
The Slum Rehabilitation Authority
S.C. Dharmadhikari
G.S. Patel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court