The petitioner, a retired employee, filed a writ petition claiming priority in employment as a Project Affected Person. The court found the grievance misconceived and dismissed the petition.
Writ petition dismissed. Rule discharged. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Order
0405wp1468.05
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION No. 1468/2005. Satish Shankarrao Chandore
The State of Maharashtra and others.
Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & P.N. DESHMUKH, JJ.
DATE : MAY 04, 2016.
Petitioner claims priority in employment as
a Project Affected Person. We find that in communication dated 23.01.2005, sent by his father to the Collector, it has been mentioned that the petitioner worked for a period of 15 years and 5 months in Artilary Corps and retired on 28.02.2003. In this situation, it is apparent that he had employment for more than 15 years.
Order
0405wp1468.05
2
which priority is being claimed, was in the year 1949. 3. Shri A.V. Palshikar, learned A.G.P. for respondent nos. 1 and 2 and Ms. M. Chandurkar, learned Counsel for respondent no.3.
JUDGE JUDGE
Rgd.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a retired project affected person has a priority right to claim employment priority.
Satish Shankarrao Chandore
The State of Maharashtra
B.P. DHARMADHIKARI
P.N. DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
