This High Court disposed of Writ Petition No. 13831 of 2016 between Sameer Shaikh and Union Bank of India based on agreed terms reflected in the Minutes of Order and Undertaking dated 15 December 2016, tendered by the parties.
Writ Petition disposed of based on Minutes of Order and Undertaking dated 15 December 2016.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
WP.13831-2016
Dond
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.13831 OF 2016
Sameer Shaikh & Anr.
..Petitioners
Vs.
Union Bank of India & Anr.
..Respondents
Mr. Rohit Gupta a/w Vinod Kothari & Phiroz Merchant i/b Apex Law Partners for Petitioners.
Mr. N.I. Bakali for Respondent No.1.
CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA AND A.S. GADKARI, JJ.
DATE: 15 DECEMBER 2016
ORDER:
Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the respective parties.
2 The learned counsel appearing for the parties state that the
parties have arrived at an agreed terms which are reflected in the Minutes
of Order and Undertaking. They tender the Minutes of Order along with
Undertaking dated 15 December 2016, which are signed by Petitioner
Nos.1 and 2 and their Advocates and the learned Advocate for Respondent
2
WP.13831-2016
No.1. There is no issue with regard to their signatures and its auhorization. The Minutes of Order along and Undertaking both dated 15 December 2016 are taken on record and marked “X” and “Y” respectively for identification.
3 In view of the above and in the interest of justice, we are inclined to dispose of the present Writ Petition based on the Minutes of Order and Undertaking.
4 Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
(A.S. GADKARI,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
Sameer Shaikh & Anr.
Union Bank of India & Anr.
Anoop V. Mota
A.S. Gadkari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
