Petitioner sought disposal based on signed Consent Terms. The court recorded the consent terms and disposed of the writ petition in terms thereof.
Petition disposed of in terms of consent terms signed by parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp1362-16.doc
sg
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1362 OF 2016
Maharashtra Employees Union ...Petitioner vs M/s. Santosh Rubber Machienry Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. ...Respondents
Mr. Arshad Shaikh, i/b. Mr. Prashant Goyal, for the Petitioner.
Mr. Mahesh Shukla, for Respondent No.1.
CORAM : S.C. GUPTE, J.
DATED: AUGUST 2, 2016
P.C. :
. Learned Counsel for the parties tender Consent Terms duly signed by the parties through their authorised representatives and their respective Advocates. Learned Counsel seek disposal of the petition in terms of the Consent Terms. The Consent Terms are taken on record, marked “X” for identification. The statements and undertakings contained therein are accepted. The petition is disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms. No order as to costs.
( S.C. GUPTE, J. )
Pg 1 of 1
Maharashtra Employees Union
M/s. Santosh Rubber Machienry Pvt. Ltd.
S.C. GUPTE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
