Allowed

Gangasagar Umakant Mamde v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC3 Feb 2016WP/1358/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, in five connected writ petitions, entertained MC students from Scheduled Tribes whose tribe certificate verification was pending. The Court directed the scrutiny committee to decide on verification proposals within eight months and allowed the petitioners to continue their university examinations and college studies pending that outcome.

What did the court decide?

Directions issued to the respondent scrutiny committee to decide on tribe certificate verification within eight months; liberty granted to petitioners to continue studies and appear for university exa

Gangasagar Umakant Mamde Vs the State of Maharashtra… — Education and Admissions | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

{1}

¶2

WP 1353.16 & ORS.odt

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.1353 OF 2016

¶5

Mahesh Pandharinath Rajle

¶6

Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Maharashtra and others Respondents

¶9

WITH

¶10

WRIT PETITIOIN NO.1354 OF 2016

¶11

Shashikant Balajirao Padalwar Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and others Respondents

¶12

WITH

¶13

WRIT PETITIOIN NO.1355 OF 2016

¶14

Mayuri D/o Purbhaji Kumbharwad Petitioner Versus

¶15

The State of Maharashtra and others Respondents

¶16

WITH

¶17

WRIT PETITIOIN NO.1356 OF 2016

¶18

Manojkumar Shankarrao Bhandare Petitioner Versus

¶19

The State of Maharashtra and others Respondents

¶20

WITH

¶21

WRIT PETITIOIN NO.1357 OF 2016

¶22

Pooja D/o Vijaysing Chauhan Petitioner Versus

¶23

The State of Maharashtra and others Respondents

WP 1353.16 & ORS.odt

{2}

WITH

WRIT PETITIOIN NO.1358 OF 2016

¶28

Gangasagar Umakant Mamde Petitioner

¶29

Versus

¶30

The State of Maharashtra and others Respondents

¶31

WITH

¶32

WRIT PETITIOIN NO.1359 OF 2016

¶33

Mahesh Bramhanand Kanthewad Petitioner Versus

¶34

The State of Maharashtra and others Respondents

¶35

WITH

¶36

WRIT PETITIOIN NO.1360 OF 2016

¶37

Rani D/o Ashok Dandewad Petitioner

¶38

Versus

¶39

The State of Maharashtra and others Respondents

¶40

WITH

¶41

WRIT PETITIOIN NO.1366 OF 2016

¶42

Somnath Shankarrao Totewad Petitioner

¶43

Versus

¶44

The State of Maharashtra and others Respondents

¶45

Mr.S.M. Vibhute advocate for the petitioners

¶46

Mr.V.M. Kagne AGP for Respondent No.1

¶47

Mr. J.R. Patil, Mr. K.M. Suryawanshi, Mr. S.M. Bhosale, Mr. Anandsing Bayas, Mr. C.A. Jadhavar, advocates for respondent University in respective petitions.

WP 1353.16 & ORS.odt

{3}

CORAM : R.M. BORDE & A.I.S. CHEEMA, JJ

¶52

Dated : 3rd FEBRUARY, 2016.

¶53

PER COURT

¶54

1 The petitioners claim to belong to Mannervarlu , Koli Mahadev & Thakur scheduled tribes (ST). They have secured admission to MBBS course, as against seats earmarked for the aforesaid category. The tribe certificates issued to the petitioners are referred for verification to the scrutiny committee and proposals are stated to be pending. In the meanwhile the Dean of the Colleges has called upon the petitioners to submit validation certificates within specified period and they have been further warned that, in the event of their failure, they will not be permitted to appear for the examination.

¶55

2 In these facts of the case, these petitions can be disposed of by issuing directions to the respondent scrutiny committee to take decision on the tribe certificate verification proposals in respect of the petitioners as expeditiously as possible and preferably within eight months from today and it is accordingly directed.

¶56

3 In the meanwhile, respondent Colleges & Universities are directed to permit the petitioners to prosecute further studies and to appear for university examination, subject however, to the

¶57

{4} WP 1353.16 & ORS.odt

¶58

decision in respect of the tribe verification proposals pending with the scrutiny committee.

¶59

4 In view of above, the writ petitions stand disposed of.

¶60

( A. I. S. CHEEMA, J. ) ( R. M. BORDE, J. )

¶61

vbd

Gangasagar Umakant Mamde v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gangasagar Umakant Mamde v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The State of Maharashtra and Another Vs Haridas Pralhad Ghumare

Tukaram Nivrati Putwad Vs State of Maharashtra and Others

Sampatrao Jamanrao Bharud Vs the State of Mah and Ors.

Shaikh Noor Shaikh Shabu Vs the Secretary Irrigation Division Mumbai and Others

Asaram Raoji Jadhav Vs the Secretary Irrigation Division Mumbai and Others

Kisan Sarjerao More and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others