The High Court of Bombay dismissed this writ petition as infructuous. The court observed that the impugned order, which extended a stay, had expired on 28th January, 2016, whereas the petition was filed on 30th January, 2016.
No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr.17.wp.1308.2016
Vina K.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1308 OF 2016
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-2, Mumbai. … Petitioner
V/s. M/s. Fulford (India) Ltd. … Respondents
Mr. Suresh Kumar a/w Ms. Samiksha Kamani for the petitioner. Mr. Madhur Agarwal i/b Mr. Atul Karsandas Jasani for the respondents.
CORAM : M. S. SANKLECHA & A. K. MENON, J.J.
DATE : 7th JULY, 2016.
P.C.:
1 of 2
Sr.17.wp.1308.2016
Vina K.
( A. K. MENON, J.) ( M. S. SANKLECHA, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition challenging an Administrative order that has expired is maintainable.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-2, Mumbai
M/s. Fulford (India) Ltd.
A. K. MENON
M. S. SANKLECHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
