The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, an suo motu or otherwise filed writ petition, disposed of without any hearing, holding that the petition does not survive in the light of an order passed by the Commissioner of Customs. No costs awarded.
Writ Petition disposed of; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
17 wpl 190 of 2016.doc
vks
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (L) NO.190 of 2016
Siddharth Logistics Co.Pvt.Ltd. and anr
V/s.
Union of India and 3 ors …. Respondents
Mr. Sunip Sen I/by Mr. Prabhakar M Jadhav, for the Petitioner. Mr. Neel Helekar, for the Respondent Nos 1 & 4. Mr. Pradeep S. Jetly, a/w Mr. Jitendra B. Mishra, for respondent Nos 2 & 3.
CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI &
DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ. DATE : 2 nd MAY, 2016.
P.C. :
After Mr. Jetly, learned counsel appearing for the respondent
Nos 2 & 3 produces copies of the order in original and communication addressed to him dated 15th April, 2016 which are taken on record and
marked as "X" and "X-1" for identification colly, we do not think that the Writ Petition survives for consideration in the light of order passed by the Commissioner of Customs. The Writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs.
[DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.] [S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.]
1/1
Siddharth Logistics Co. Pvt. Ltd. and anr
Union of India and 3 ors
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI
DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
