recruited in judicial service, the recruiting authority, as the custodian of public interest in the fair dispensation of justice, was entitled to scrutinize the reasons which weighed in the judgment of acquittal. They have an important bearing on the conduct and antecedents of the Applicant. In the present case, this is exactly what has been done and the Hon'ble Administrative Judges' Committee, after considering all the relevant material, including the reasons for acquittal, has taken the decision of not appointing the Petitioner. He submitted that it is not even the case of the Petitioner that the decision is actuated for any extraneous reasons or is tainted with bias or malafides. The Petitioner, having no fundamental right for being appointed but merely being considered in a fair manner, the decision of the Hon'ble Administrative Judges' Committee could not faulted. He therefore submitted that no interference was required by us in our equitable, extraordinary and discretionary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and the Writ Petition be dismissed with costs.
