The Bombay High Court allowed petitioners to withdraw two connected writ petitions with liberty to avail of alternate remedies before disposing of them as withdrawn.
Leave granted to withdraw petitions with liberty to avail of alternate remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp294516.odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.2945 OF 2016
Pritranjan s/o Ramrao Sarkate & others Petitioners
Versus
The Director General, National Institute of Electronics and Information Technology & others Respondents
Mr.G.K.Naik-Thigle, advocate for petitioners. Mr.S.B.Deshpande, Assistant Solicitor General for Respondents. Mr.A.B.Girase, Government Pleader for Respondents.
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.12413 OF 2015
Amol s/o Bhimrao Birare Petitioner
Versus
Union of India & others Respondents
Mr.R.O.Awasarmol, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.D.G.Nagode, Standing Counsel for Respondents No.1 to 3. Mr.V.D.Sonawane, advocate for Respondent No.4.
CORAM : R.M.BORDE & P.R.BORA, JJ. DATE : 16th March, 2016
PER COURT:
Learned Counsel appearing for respective petitioners, on instructions, seek leave to withdraw the petitions with liberty to avail of alternate remedy provided in law.
Leave granted.
Both the writ petitions stand disposed of as withdrawn with
liberty as prayed for.
P.R.BORA R.M.BORDE JUDGE JUDGE
Pritranjan s/o Ramrao Sarkate & others
The Director General, National Institute of Electronics and Information Technology & others
Amol s/o Bhimrao Birare
Union of India & others
R.M. Borde
P.R. Bora
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
