High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking intervention regarding student admissions, directing petitioners to approach the Supreme Court if needed, citing its prior judgment and the annual admission deadline.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
skn 1/1 25791.16-wpst.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (ST.) NO. 25791 OF 2016
Dandawate Devdatta Subhash and others. ... Petitioners. V/s. The State of Maharashtra and other. ... Respondents.
Akhlaque Solkar for the petitioners. Ms.M.S.Bhende, AGP for the respondents.
CORAM : DR.MANJULA CHELLUR, C.J. AND M.S.SONAK, J. DATE : 3rd October 2016.
P.C. :
In the light of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Parshvanath Charitable Trust v. All India Council for Technical Education , (2013) 3 SCC 385, especially, referring to paragraphs- 41 and 43, we are of the opinion, this Court cannot entertain this writ petition and, if at all the petitioners need any indulgence or intervention, they have to apply to the Apex Court since the last date for admission of the students even as against the vacant seat is 15th August every year. The petition is disposed of accordingly.
(M.S.SONAK, J.)
CHIEF JUSTICE
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Parshvanath Charitable Trust v. All India Council for Technical EducationRelied on¶7
Parshvanath Charitable Trust v. All India Council for Technical Education, (2013) 3 SCC 385 · Who else cites this
Dandawate Devdatta Subhash and others
The State of Maharashtra and other
Dr. Manjula Chellur
M.S. Sonak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
