The High Court of Bombay disposed of Writ Petition No. 1194 of 2013 after the petitioner stated they would not press the case, reserving liberty to adopt appropriate proceedings for breach of contractual obligations.
The writ petition is disposed of with liberty to adopt appropriate proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1-WP.1194.2013.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1194 OF 2013
Forum of Natural Gas Industrial } Consumers, Mumbai } Petitioner versus Union of India and Ors. } Respondents
Mr. Harish Pandya with Ms. Kathleen Lobo and Mr. Pulkitesh Dutt i/b. M/s. Khaitan and Co. for the petitioner.
Mr. M. S. Bharadwaj i/b. Mr. Dhiren H. Shah for respondent no. 1.
Mr. Ashish Kamat with Mr. Pradeep Mane and Mr. Jay Zaveri i/b. M/s. Chitnis and Co. for respondent no. 2.
Mr. Pradeep Rajagopal with ms. Debashree Mandpe i/b. Ms. Rekha Rajagopal for respondent no. 3.
CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ. DATED :- JUNE 23, 2016
P.C. :-
After the writ petition was argued for sometime and
the nature of the dispute was pointed out, Mr. Pandya, on instructions, states that the petitioner and its members would not press this petition. Liberty be reserved to them to adopt appropriate proceedings as are permissible in law for breach of the contractual obligations by the respective respondents.
Page 1 of 2
J.V.Salunke,PA
1-WP.1194.2013.doc
of with liberty to adopt appropriate proceedings.
Page 2 of 2
J.V.Salunke,PA
Forum of Natural Gas Industrial Consumers, Mumbai
Union of India
S. C. DHARMADHIKARI
DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
