Amar Pandharinath Bhandari v. M/S Samta Sahkari Bank Ltd. and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner alleged fraud and misrepresentation by Respondent 1, claiming he paid Rs. 8 Lacs believing two distinct properties were the same. The Single Judge held Article 226/227 inappropriate for such allegations and dispensed the petition, reserving liberty for civil proceedings.
What did the court decide?
Petition disposed of without adjudication on merits with liberty to adopt appropriate civil proceedings.