Disposed

M/S. Richfeel Health and Beauty Pvt. Ltd. through Representative Mr. Maulesh Thakkar v. Pune Municipal Corporation through Joint Commissioner

Bombay HC25 Oct 2016WP/11575/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition, filed by a private company, sought a direction for the Pune Municipal Corporation to consider its application for benefit under the Local Body Tax Amnesty Scheme 2015. The court disposed of the petition by directing the respondent to consider the representation within eight weeks following principles of natural justice.

What did the court decide?

Directions issued to the Pune Municipal Commissionerto consider the petitioner's application for benefit under the Local Body Tax Amnesty Scheme 2015 within eight weeks following the principles of nat

M/S. Richfeel Health and Beauty Pvt. Ltd. through… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

wp-11575-2016

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 11575 OF 2016

¶4

M/s. Richfeel Health and Beauty Pvt. Ltd., .. Petitioner. v/s. Pune Municipal Corporation .. Respondent.

¶5

Mr. Mandar Sonam i/b. Ravi Bhardwaj, for the Petitioner. Mr. Abhijit P. Kulkarni, for the Respondent.

¶6

CORAM: M.S.SANKLECHA, & S.C.GUPTE, JJ. DATE : 25^th OCTOBER, 2016.

¶7

P.C:-

¶8

Not on board. Mentioned.

¶9

This Petition was on board on 20^th October, 2016 and was adjourned to 25^th October,2016. Therefore, at the request of the parties, the Petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission.

¶10

2 The only prayer being pressed on behalf of the Petitioner is that Respondent No.1- Pune Municipal Corporation be directed to consider and dispose of the Petitioner's application/ representation dated 3^rd February, 2015, claiming to be entitled to the benefit of the Amnesty Scheme introduced by the State of Maharashtra dated 3^rd February, 2016 called the Local Body Tax Amnesty Scheme, 2015.

¶11

3 It is the grievance of the Petitioner that in spite of repeated representations, the Respondent- Corporation is not considering the

1 of 2

S.R.JOSHI

wp-11575-2016

Petitioner's application / representation, claiming benefit of the Local Body Tax – Amnesty Scheme 2015. The Petitioner's representation dated 3^rd February, 2016 to the Joint Commissioner of the Corporation, seeking benefit of the Amnesty Scheme has not yet been disposed of.

¶16

4 Mr. Kulkarni, learned Counsel appearing for the RespondentCorporation, on instruction, states that the Petitioner's representation dated 3^rd February, 2016 would be considered by Municipal Commissioner / Joint Municipal Commissioner within a period of eight weeks from today, following the principles of natural justice.

¶17

5 Petition disposed of in the above terms . No order as to

¶18

costs.

¶19

(S.C.GUPTE,J.)

¶20

(M.S.SANKLECHA,J.)

¶21

2 of 2

¶22

S.R.JOSHI

M/S. Richfeel Health and Beauty Pvt. Ltd. through Representative Mr. Maulesh Thakkar v. Pune Municipal Corporation through Joint Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S. Richfeel Health and Beauty Pvt. Ltd. through Representative Mr. Maulesh Thakkar v. Pune Municipal Corporation through Joint Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ranjan Chandrakant Javeri Vs Khetani Textile Industries Pvt. Ltd. and 9 Others

Ranjan Chandrakant Javeri Vs Khetani Textile Industries Pvt. Ltd. and 9 Others

Spring Fab and Textiles Pvt. Ltd. and 3 Ors. Vs Ranjan C. Javeri and 5 Ors.

Municipal Nursing and Paramedical Staff Union Vs the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Ors.

Century Consultants Ltd. Vs Anil Mithalal Shah

Choithram Galomal Selwani Vs Navin Gupta and Anr.