Disposed

Amikripa Land Developers Pvt. Ltd. v. Slum Rehabilitation Authority and 2 Ors.

Bombay HC23 Dec 2016WP/114/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition regarding interim relief. The court directed the High Power Committee to expedite the hearing and ruled that existing interim relief would continue pending the outcome of the interim application.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed; high power committee directed to hear interim application expeditiously; existing interim relief preserved.

Amikripa Land Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Bombay HC (2016)

ash

wpl-2988.16

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶5

WRIT PETITION (L) NO.2988 of 2016

¶6

Amikripa Land Developers Pvt. Ltd. .. Petitioner Vs Slum Rehabilitation Authority and Others. .. Respondents

¶7

Shri Madhur S. Surana for the Petitioner.

¶8

Shri Ashish Singh along with sHri Rahul Sinha i/b DSK Legal for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2.

¶9

Shri P.G. Kathane for the Respondent No.3.

¶10

Shri Abhijeet Devkhile i/b Shri Abhijeet Desai for the Respondent No.4. Shri Amar Mishra, AGP for the Respondent No.5 State.

¶11

CORAM : A.S. OKA & SMT.ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ DATED : 23RD DECEMBER 2016

¶12

P.C.

¶13

The High Power Committee will be available for hearing of the matters on 7^th January 2017 and 21^st January 2017.

¶14

Considering the limited controversy, the Petition is disposed of by passing the following order:

¶15

ORDER :

¶16

(a) We direct the High Power Committee to take up the Application filed by the Petitioner for hearing of the prayer for ad-interim and/or interim relief as expeditiously as possible and in any event, either on 7^th January 2017 or 21^st January 2017;

ash

wpl-2988.16

(b) Application for grant of ad-interim and/or interim relief shall be decided as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of three weeks from the date on which the submissions are heard;

¶21

(c) The ad-interim relief granted on 1^st November 2016 by the learned Vacation Judge will continue to operate till the date of passing of the orders on the prayer for ad-interim/interim relief;

¶22

(d) In the event, the Application for grant of ad-interim and/or interim relief is rejected, the ad-interim relief granted in terms of the order dated 1^st November 2016 passed by the learned Vacation Judge will continue to operate for a period of two weeks from the date on which the Application for adinterim/interim relief is disposed of by the High Power Committee;

¶23

(e) We have not made any adjudication on merits of the controversy.

¶24

(SMT.ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J)

¶25

( A.S. OKA, J )

Amikripa Land Developers Pvt. Ltd. v. Slum Rehabilitation Authority and 2 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amikripa Land Developers Pvt. Ltd. v. Slum Rehabilitation Authority and 2 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S. K.A. Malle Pharmaceuticals Ltd.through Shri Prashant Satghare Vs M/S. Joshi Billion Gems and Jewellery Pvt.Ltd and 3 Ors.

Madrass Arabia Rizvia Gousiya Masjid Vs State of Maharashtra and 5 Ors.

Ashwin Jaya Shetty Vs Union of India (through General Manager, Divisional Railway Manager and Divisional Enginner Lm)

Mr. Jitendrakumar Jagdish Indise Vs Mr. Sambhaji Dhondiram Pandit and Ors.

M/S. Mauli Sai Developers Private and Anr. Vs New Navratna Vakratund Co-Operative Housing Society and 3 Ors.

Tata Capital Financial Services Limited Vs Madhucon Infra Limited and 12 Ors.