The High Court declined to entertain the writ petition as the remedy for the grievance lies under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. The petition was disposed of keeping the remedy open and merits contentions stayed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP.11082.2015(P-7)
1
mnm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 11082 OF 2015
Vaibhav Tulashiram Mane
...Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
...Respondents
Mr. Rakesh Bhatkar for the Petitioner Mr. V.S. Gokhale AGP for the Respondent Nos. 1 & 2
CORAM : A.S.OKA, & C.V. BHADANG, JJ. DATE : JANUARY 12, 2016
P.C.:
Not on board. Taken on board.
open.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should entertain a writ petition when a remedy is available under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code.
Whether the petitioner's contentions on merits should be decided.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vaibhav Tulashiram Mane
The State of Maharashtra
A.S. Oka
C.V. Bhadang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
