Disposed

Ramakant S/O Nagnath Pise v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC23 Nov 2016WP/1107/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court dismissed the criminal writ petition as withdrawn. Regarding bail, the court refused relief stating findings prima facie match evidence. Registry was directed to transmit original records for paper book preparation.

What did the court decide?

Criminal writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; Bail application rejected; Direction to registry to send original record for paper book preparation.

Ramakant S/O Nagnath Pise Vs the State of Maharashtra and… — Bail and Remand | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

1 Cri.WP-1107-15

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1107 OF 2015

¶4

Ramakant Nagnath Pise ...PETITIONER

¶5

versus

¶6

The State of Maharashtra & ors.

¶7

...RESPONDENT

¶8

Mr. S. S. Deshmukh, Advocate for petitioner Mr. S. G. Karlekar, APP for respondents

¶9

CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, AND K.K. SONAWANE, JJ.

¶10

DATED : 23^rd NOVEMBER, 2016.

¶11

Order :-

¶12

Learned counsel appearing for applicants, on instructions, seeks

¶13

leave to withdraw the present application.

¶14

Leave granted.

¶15

Criminal writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.

¶16

Sd/Sd/-

¶17

[ K. K. SONAWANE, J.] [ S.S. SHINDE, J.]

¶18

MTK

¶19

2 Cri.WP-1107-15

¶20

Sr. No. 9 Cri. Appln. 4820 of 2015

¶21

Heard.

¶22

Issue notice to respondents, returnable on 13-12-2016.

¶23

Sr.No. 3 Cri. Appln No. 5156 of 2016

¶24

There is office report that office objections are not removed. In case, office objections are not removed, further time is extended till 25-11-2016.

¶25

At the request of learned APPP, stand over to 05-12-2016. Ad-interim relief granted earlier to continue till the date of hearing.

¶26

Sr. No. 15. Cr. Application No. 1281 of 2014

¶27

By way of last opportunity, at the request of learned counsel for respondent, stand over to 14-12-2016.

¶28

Sr.No. 38 Cr. Application No. of 2014

¶29

At the request of learned APP, by way of last opportunity, stand over to 30-11-2016. Ad-interim relief granted earlier to continue till the next date of hearing.

¶30

Sr.No. 22.Criminal Application No. 6134 of 2015.

¶31

When advocate on record is called out to argue the matter, he submits that already appellant has withdrawn brief from him. Since this application is pending for more than one year, with the assistant of learned APP, we have considered the case of the applicant for bail. Original record is also available for perusal. There are eye witnesses, who have witnessed the incident. The account of witnesses is corroborated by medical and other evidence brought on record. By no stretch of imagination, we do not find it is a fit case to grant bail. In that we shall elaborate in the appeal filed by the applicant. Suffice to say that findings recorded by the trial court prima facie appears to be in consonance with evidence brought on record. For the reasons stated in the application for bail, the same stands rejected.

¶32

Registry to sent back the original record to the Registry of Sessions

¶33

3 Cri.WP-1107-15

¶34

Court, at Vaijapur. Upon receiving said original record by the Registry of Sessions Court, at Vaijapur shall prepare the paper book and sent back it to this court along with original record as expeditiously as possible, however, within a period of four months from today.

¶35

Upon receiving paper book and original record and proceedings from the trial court, liberty to the appellant to mention the matter for hearing.

Ramakant S/O Nagnath Pise v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramakant S/O Nagnath Pise v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prasad S/O Nilkhant Ganu and Others Vs Fthe State of Maharashtra and Others

The State of Maharashtra Vs Sambhaji S/O Sudhakar Deshmukh and Ors.

Prabhakar Pandurang Kochure Vs the State of Maharashtra

Balasaheb S/O More and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Bapurao S/O Marotrao Hake Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Sangita W/O Avinash Shinde and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.