Mesu Dhondiba Vidhate v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petition against premature release. Court held decision categories by government and discharged petition as infructous after A.P.P. instructed disclosure.
What did the court decide?
Rule discharged.
What the court decided
jdk 1 3.crwp.1102.16.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL W.P. NO. 1102 OF 2016
Mesu Dhondiba Vidhate
.. Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
.. Respondents
Mr. D.G. Khamkar Advocate for Petitioner Mrs. S.D. Shinde A.P.P. for the State
CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI AND SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.
DATED : MAY 06, 2016
ORAL ORDER : [PER SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J. ]:
- Rule. By consent, rule is made returnable forthwith.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mesu Dhondiba Vidhate
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
V.K. Tahilramani
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court