This Court dismissed the writ petition preferring a preliminary objection regarding the availability of an alternative statutory appeal under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966, without examining the merits of the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 of 2 WP.1095.2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1095 OF 2016
Mrs.Sapna Chandrakant Gojare
Petitioner
versus
The State of Maharashtra and others
Respondents
Ms.Smita Gaidhani for Petitioner.
Mr.C.P.Yadav, AGP, for Respondents.
CORAM : D.H.WAGHELA, C.J. AND M.S.SONAK, J.
DATE : 9th March 2016
PC :
2 of 2 WP.1095.2016
(CHIEF JUSTICE)
(M.S.SONAK, J.)
MST
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition challenging a penalty order imposed by a Tahsildar can be entertained when the petitioner has a statutory appeal available under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Mrs. Sapna Chandrakant Gojare
The State of Maharashtra
D.H.WAGHELA
M.S.SONAK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
